France, which has been living a nightmare for months, is waking up!

Pr. Christian Perronne

Dear friends, In many cities of our beautiful country, the people are on the march to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy. As a doctor, a specialist in infectious diseases, and having been president of numerous public health bodies or councils, including on vaccines, I am aware every day of the uncertainties that generate fear and the growing distress of our fellow citizens.

I take the risk of once again being called a « conspiracy theorist » or, better yet, a « reassuranceist », a term used to describe those who criticize or challenge the single-mindedness of the public.

I end up being proud of these designations, my words expressing the truth having never changed since the beginning of the epidemic. I therefore consider that it is my responsibility to express myself again today on the whole medical aspect of Covid-19 and in particular on the subject of vaccination, now the central and almost unique element of the State’s health policy.

Many French people have been hypnotized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, a second terrible wave of the epidemic had been announced, worse than the first. The Minister of Health, Dr. Olivier Véran, the President of the Scientific Council of the Élysée, Pr Jean François Delfraissy, the Director General of Health, Pr Jérôme Salomon, the Pasteur Institute announced catastrophic figures with an exponential increase in the number of deaths. The hospitals were to be saturated and overwhelmed.

Even the President of the Republic, in a recent televised speech announcing the reconfinement, predicted no less than 400,000 deaths, adding to the 200,000 deaths estimated shortly before by Professor Arnaud Fontanet de Pasteur.

These unrealistic figures had only one goal, to maintain fear in order to keep us confined, wisely masked. Yet the widespread use of masks in the general population has no scientifically proven benefit in stopping the SARS-COV-2 epidemic. The use of masks should be targeted to patients, their entourage (especially people at risk) and caregivers in contact.

However, the epidemic is regressing and has not led to an apocalypse. The dynamics of the curve had been showing for weeks the profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is observed with some viruses once the epidemic wave is over. This reflects the adaptation of the virus to humans and is also a reflection of the herd immunity that is growing in the population and protecting us naturally.

The virus strains currently circulating have lost their virulence. Authorities will not be able to say that this is due to containment because the downward trend had begun even before it was introduced.

The decline of the epidemic had even begun, in some cities, before the curfew was introduced.

Unfortunately, there are still deaths that occur among the very elderly, the very obese, or people suffering from severe diabetes, severe hypertension, cardio-respiratory or kidney diseases that are already disabling. These at-risk individuals are well identified.

Health measures should therefore be targeted to protect them, detect them and treat them as early as possible at the onset of symptoms with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, whose efficacy and safety have been widely confirmed, if given early.

Many deaths could have been prevented. However, general practitioners and geriatricians have been discouraged from treating. In this context, continuing to persecute our children behind unnecessary masks remains incomprehensible.

All these measures are being taken to make the French demand a vaccine. But what is the point of a generalized vaccine for a disease whose mortality rate is close to 0.05%? None. This mass vaccination is useless. Moreover, the risks of vaccination may be greater than the benefits.

What is most worrisome is that many countries, including France, say they are ready to vaccinate in the coming weeks, even though the development and evaluation of these products has been done in haste and no results on the effectiveness or dangerousness of these vaccines have been published to date.

We have only been entitled to press releases from the industrial manufacturers, allowing their shares to soar on the stock market. The worst thing is that the first « vaccines » proposed to us are not vaccines, but gene therapy products.

We are going to inject nucleic acids that will cause our own cells to produce elements of the virus. The consequences of this injection are completely unknown, because it is a first in humans. What if the cells of some « vaccinated » people produce too many viral elements, leading to uncontrollable reactions in our body?

The first gene therapies will be with RNA, but there are projects with DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message goes from DNA to RNA, but the reverse is possible under certain circumstances, especially since our human cells have contained since the dawn of time so-called « endogenous » retroviruses integrated into the DNA of our chromosomes.

These « domesticated » retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless (unlike HIV, AIDS retroviruses for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, capable of transcribing backwards from RNA to DNA.

Thus, RNA that is foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for DNA, just as foreign, which can then be integrated into our chromosomes. There is therefore a real risk of permanently transforming our genes. There is also the possibility, by modifying the nucleic acids of our eggs or sperm, of transmitting these genetic modifications to our children.

The people who promote these gene therapies, falsely called « vaccines », are sorcerer’s apprentices and take the French, and more generally the citizens of the world, for guinea pigs.

We do not want to become, like transgenic tomatoes or corn, GMOs (genetically modified organisms). A medical manager of one of the pharmaceutical companies said a few days ago that he hoped for an individual protection effect, but that we should not expect too much impact on the transmission of the virus, and therefore on the dynamics of the epidemic.

This is a disguised admission that this is not a vaccine. And that’s the last straw.

I am all the more horrified because I have always been a pro-vaccine advocate and for years I have presided over vaccine policy-making bodies.

Today, we have to stop this extremely worrying plan. Louis Pasteur must be turning over in his grave. Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must regain the upper hand.

Christian PERRONNE